Starbucks Five Forces Analysis (Porter Model) and Recommendations - Panmore Institute (2023)

Starbucks Corporation (aka Starbucks Coffee Company) is growing successfully through effective management in addressing the impact of the Five Forces (Porter's model) in the global coffee and coffeehouse industry environment. Through Michael E. Porter's Five Forces Analysis model, the Starbucks industry environment is evaluated based on external factors that define the competitive landscape. This external analysis model provides information for the strategic management of the coffee company to address the five forces, namely competitive rivalry, bargaining power of customers or buyers, bargaining power of suppliers, threat of substitution and threat of new entrants. Starbucks operates in a highly competitive business environment. Competitors are food service companies like Dunkin',MC Donalds,Wendys,Burger King, and subway.The Starbucks Corporation SWOT Analysisdemonstrates strengths to counteract the competitive forces described in this Five Forces Analysis. However, the company must continuously improve to maintain its competencies and its industry and market position despite the negative impact of competitive dynamics.

This five forces analysis by Porter of the coffeehouse chain highlights some of the most notable external factors that the company's strategies must consider. These strategies focus on competitive advantage while achieving fulfillmentStarbucks mission statement and corporate vision.

Overview - Porter's Five Forces Analysis of Starbucks Corporation

The powerful force of competition is the combined effect of the external factors identified in this five forces analysis of the coffeehouse industry environment. The most important factors in Starbucks' strategic considerations are competitive rivalry, the bargaining power of customers, and the threat of substitute products. The other forces also influence the coffee company's business development, but to a lesser extent. In summary, the intensities of the five forces affecting Starbucks Coffee Company are as follows:

1. Competitive rivalry or competition - Strong force
2. Bargaining power of buyers or customers - Strong Force
3. Bargaining Power of Suppliers – Moderate Force
4. Threat of Replacement or Substitution - Strong Violence
5. Threat of new entrants or new entrants - Moderate Force

Given the external business environment described in Porter's Five Forces Analysis, Starbucks' strategic goal must focus on maximizing its strengths and capabilities. For example, the coffeehouse business can implement strategies to make its brand even stronger. This recommendation is intended to address the powerful forces of competitive rivalry, buyer power and the threat of substitution against Starbucks. Specific to the force of competition presented in this five forces analysis, one recommendation is to strengthen the coffeehouse chain's competitive advantages. For example, the company can improve the diversity of its supply chain to improve access to resources and the stability of coffee processing and production. Changes in the supplier network may require corresponding changesStarbucks operations management strategies. Additionally, this Five Forces analysis points to the recommendation that the coffee company should increase its marketing aggressiveness to attract and retain more customers despite the power of substitution, competition and new entry.

Competition or competitive rivalry (strong force)

Starbucks Coffee Company faces the powerful force of competitive rivalry. In the Five Forces Analysis model, this force relates to the influence of competitors on each other and the environment of the coffeehouse industry. In this case, the following external factors contribute to the strong competitiveness against Starbucks:

• Large number of coffee houses and food service establishments (strong force)
• Moderate diversity of companies (moderate force)
• Low switching costs between coffeehouses (strong power)

The large number of coffee houses and restaurants is an external factor that, in the context of this five-force analysis, intensifies the competitive situation. Starbucks has many competitors of varying sizes, including multinationals and small local coffee shops. In relation to this, the competitors are moderately different in terms of specialization and strategy. For example, some coffee houses only focus on local coffees. In this Starbucks five forces analysis, such moderate diversity strengthens competition by segmenting the market into segments based on business specialty or strategy. In addition, the competition is strengthened by the low switching costs between the coffee houses. In the Five Forces analysis model, low switching costs reduce barriers when customers switch from Starbucks to its competitors. Based on this component of the Five Forces Analysis, one of the coffee company's top challenges is competition.Starbucks Corporation's generic strategy for competitive advantage and intense growth strategiesreflect strategic responses to such competitive challenges.

Bargaining power of customers or buyers (strong force)

Starbucks experiences the strong power or bargaining power of buyers or customers. In Porter's five forces analysis model, this power is based on the impact of individual customers and their groups on the coffeehouse business environment. The following external factors contribute to customers' strong bargaining power over Starbucks:

• Low switching costs between cafes (strong power)
• High availability of substitute food and drink (strong force)
• Small size of individual buyers (weak force)

Bargaining power of consumers or buyers is among the most important forces influencing the coffeehouse industry identified in this five forces analysis. With low switching costs, customers can easily switch from Starbucks to other brands. Additionally, the high availability of substitute products means customers can easily forego the company's products and opt for substitute products such as instant beverages from vending machines and home-brewed coffee from local roasters. These strong external factors overshadow the fact that individual purchases are small compared to Starbucks' overall earnings. In the context of Five Forces Analysis, small individual purchases mean that individual consumers have a weak or insignificant impact on the business. However, low switching costs and a high availability of replacements lead to an overall strong bargaining power of customers vis-à-vis Starbucks. Such a powerful force in this component of the Five Forces Analysis shows that customer bargaining power is a strategic issue of the highest priority.Marketing Mix or 4Ps of Starbucks Corporationcan support brand empowerment to partially address consumer bargaining power.

Bargaining power of Starbucks suppliers (moderate strength)

Starbucks Coffee Company is exposed to the moderate power or bargaining power of its suppliers. Porter's Five Forces Analysis model views this power as the influence that suppliers have on the coffeehouse chain's business and its industry environment. The following external factors contribute to the moderate bargaining power of suppliers at Starbucks Corporation:

• Moderate size of individual providers (moderate strength)
• Limited choice of suppliers (moderate force)
• Supply Shortfalls (strong power)

The moderate size of individual suppliers is an external factor that puts moderate pressure on Starbucks. According to the five forces analysis, larger suppliers have stronger bargaining power in the coffee business. On the other hand, the limited variety of suppliers gives them only moderate bargaining power against Starbucks. For example, different suppliers may have similar supplies if they source their coffee beans from the same region or country. In the Five Forces Analysis model, this condition allows Starbucks to switch from one supplier to another with moderate ease because of the similarities between these suppliers. The bargaining power of coffee suppliers is partly strengthened by supply bottlenecks. Such shortages are associated with issues such as droughts and frosts damaging crops, among others, and other environmental concerns outlined indie PESTEL/PESTLE-Analyse der Starbucks Coffee Company. Shortages allow suppliers to enforce their demands, for example by raising the price of coffee beans, and thus strengthen their bargaining power in terms of the five forces analysis. Overall, the external factors listed in this section generate the moderate strength of the providers in the business environment of the coffee house chain.

Threat of deputies or substitutes (strong force)

Strong force or threat of substitution affects Starbucks Corporation. In the Five Forces Analysis model, this threat relates to the impact of substitute goods or services on the coffee business and its external environment. The following external factors contribute to the strong threat of substitution versus Starbucks:

• High availability of substitute food and drink (strong force)
• Low switching costs between coffeehouses and substitutes (strong power)
• High affordability of substitute products (strong force)

This component of the five forces analysis indicates that substitutes have a strong potential to negatively impact the business of coffeehouse chains. The high availability of substitutes makes it easy for consumers to buy these substitutes instead of Starbucks products. There are many substitutes such as B. ready-to-drink beverages, instant beverage powders and purees, and foodstuffs, which are available in various outlets. These outlets include upscale restaurants, vending machines, supermarkets and grocery stores, and small convenience stores. The five forces analysis framework views this high availability as an external factor that strengthens the replacement of Starbucks products. In addition, the low switching costs further increase the risk of substitution for coffee house products. This external factor is seen in the Five Forces Analysis as the enabler for consumers to switch from Starbucks to substitute products. Additionally, many of these substitutes cost less than the company's food and beverage products, increasing the risk of substitution.The organizational culture of Starbucks Corporationcan help counteract the threat of substitute products by providing a warm and quality service that strengthens customer loyalty. In relation to,Starbucks' corporate social responsibility strategy and stakeholder management initiativescan help retain customers if the focus is on sustainable business practices.

Threat of new entrants/new entrants against Starbucks (moderate strength)

The moderate force or threat of new entrants poses challenges for Starbucks Corporation. In Porter's five forces analysis model, this threat relates to the impact of new players or new entrants in the coffeehouse industry. In this business case, the following external factors contribute to the moderate threat of new entrants to Starbucks:

• Moderate business costs (moderate power)
• Moderate supply chain costs (moderate power)
• High cost of brand development (weak force)

The moderate cost of doing business refers to the cost of establishing and maintaining operations in the coffeehouse industry. For example, the cost of running a small coffeehouse is lower than that of a coffeehouse chain. Also, smaller cafes have lower supply needs and associated supply chain costs. Despite their relatively small size, many new entrants can reduce Starbucks' market share and revenue. Thus, in this five forces analysis, this external factor leads to a moderate threat from new entrants into the coffeehouse industry. Related to this, the high cost of branding is seen in the Five Forces Analysis as an external factor that reduces the risk of substitution by Starbucks Corporation. Small local coffee houses typically don't have the resources to develop their brands to directly compete with the Starbucks brand. Also, brand development takes years to reach the level and strength of the Starbucks brand. The external factors enumerated in this part of the five forces analysis make the threat of substitutes a moderate force and thus a significant but limited issue in the strategic management decisions of the multinational coffeehouse chain.

references

• Anastasiu, L., Gavriş, O., & Maier, D. (2020). Is human capital ready for change? A strategic approach that matches Porter's five forces to human resources.sustainability, 12(6), 2300.
• Isabelle D, Horak K, McKinnon S, & Palumbo C (2020). Is Porter's Five Forces Framework Still Relevant? A study of the capital/labor intensity continuum across the mining and IT industries.Technology Innovation Management Review, 10(6).
• Martinez-Contreras, R.M., Hernandez-Mora, N.C., Vargas-Leguizamon, Y.R., & Borja-Barrera, S.M. (2022). Pestel Analysis and the Porter's Five Forces: An Integrated Model of Strategic Sectors. InHandbook of Research on Organizational Sustainability in Turbulent Economies(pp. 292-314). IGI Global.
• Schultz, H. (2012).Pour Your Heart In: How Starbucks Built a Company Cup by Cup. Hachette UK.
• Starbucks Coffee Company - About Us.
• Starbucks Coffee Company - Supplier Diversity Program.
• Starbucks Corporation – Formular 10-K.
• US Department of Agriculture - Economic Research Service - Food Industry - Market Segments.
• US Department of Commerce - International Trade Administration - Consumer Goods Industry.